Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Common Core State [sic] Standards

 

463 in the collection  

    What’s a Math Educator to Do?

    Michael Paul Goldenberg has a good comment at Rational Mathematics Education.

    The first issue is mathematics teaching. I strongly agree with Garfunkel's statement that what people should do is "breathe new life into the 1989 Standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), which were never given a fair chance to succeed." I always felt NCTM gave up too easily.

    The second issue is Garfunkel's dilemma: What does an expert do in the face of the fact that the Common Core State(sic) Standards are both a done deal and a disaster? I suspect many literacy experts are choosing the same path he chooses. . . continue working within the system and trying to do good.

    I strongly disagree that it's the right path, but I am respectful of the dilemma. At least he is not keeping silent about how terrible the CCSS are, which is more than the literacy experts are doing.


    by Sol Garfunkel

    I feel like a schizophrenic. I truly think that the Common
    Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) are a disaster.
    I think that the high-stakes tests based on these
    standards will stultify the mathematics curriculum for a
    decade, curtailing any attempts at experimentation and
    creativity. I think they will take us back to a time when
    the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, i.e., when motivated
    math students got ahead and weaker students just
    dropped away, knowing little and content to tell anyone
    who would listen that they were always bad in math.

    They’re not the standards I would have written. In
    the spirit of full disclosure, I was actually on the writing
    team for CCSSM. Unfortunately they chose to use only
    the prepositions I wrote—none of the nouns or verbs. I
    have taken to writing blogs and op-ed pieces criticizing
    CCSSM and calling for quite radical change. So why do I
    feel like a schizophrenic? Because I am at the same time
    working to make the implementation of the CCSSM be as
    effective as possible!

    I don’t think that this is hypocrisy. I really don’t. These
    standards, the tests based on them, and the curricula
    based on those tests based on those standards are going
    to be with us for a long time. Teachers will be trained
    in CCSSM both pre- and in-service, and a huge cohort of
    students will go through the system that is evolving. It
    will not be possible to be a U.S. mathematics educator—at
    least for the next decade—and not be involved with the
    implementation of CCSSM. I care about that generation of
    kids. I care that they learn as much mathematics as they
    can and that they learn to use that mathematics as they
    go on—in school, in careers, as knowledgeable citizens,
    and in their daily lives.

    And so I will work with the assessment consortia. I will
    sit on advisory boards for curriculum projects. I will write
    reports to NSF and other funders talking about how to do
    this “right”, even though in my heart of hearts I wished
    they’d tear these standards up and start from scratch or,
    better yet, breathe new life into the 1989 Standards of
    the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM),
    which were never given a fair chance to succeed. In fact,
    it is the lesson of the “math wars” that helps to make me
    as divided as I am. In the 1990s critics of those standards
    simply threw rocks. The fact that 10+ years of attacks did
    nothing to help the mathematics education of so many
    children was not their concern. In their eyes their cause
    was just and therefore sacrifices had to be made.

    I am not so cavalier. I have strong and fervent beliefs
    that CCSSM is wrong-headed, and I will say so in public. But
    I will also work to make the emerging system as positive
    an experience for teachers and students as possible. And
    I know I’m not alone. It is always easier to criticize and be
    cynical. It is harder to roll up one’s sleeves and get to work.
    So I will remain a schizophrenic, work for students and
    teachers to learn what mathematics they can, and work
    for the day that our standards come back to their senses.

    Solomon Garfunkel is Executive Director,
    Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications

    sol@comap.com
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti877

    — Sol Garfunkel
    Notices of the AMS
    August 01, 2012
    http://www.ams.org/journals/notices/201207/rtx120700909p.pdf


    Index of Common Core [sic] Standards

Pages: 19   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.