Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    National Corporate Broadcasting

    Rich Gibson puts a Merrow Report on education in San Diego in context, that is, rising inequality, the promise of perpetual war, deepening racism and nationalism, and a population still behaving as people usually behave in pacified areas, that is, as voluntary servants.The only thing Rich left out is that Eli Broad joined in the efforts to oust the honest school board member Francis Zimmerman, a courageous and persevering woman whose insight was key to maintaining a modicum of sanity in the system.

    No, Eli Broad does not live in San Diego, but Eli Broad has his fingers in education throughout the country.


    by Rich Gibson

    PBS is running a three day Merrow Report on NCLB. Today, the second
    day, the report focused on San Diego.

    While it would take a book to
    refute all the nonsense that Merrow tossed in (right in line with
    Monday's report which used a muddled middle-school track and field
    metaphor to investigate NCLB) , here are a few things that come right to mind.

    One has to put this report, and what really is National Corporate
    Broadcasting, in context, that is, rising inequality, the promise of
    perpetual war, deepening racism and nationalism, and a population
    still behaving as people usually behave in pacified areas, that is,
    as voluntary servants. The context, then, is the emergence of
    fascism. Sometimes I surprise myself with my own naivete, but I
    expected more from PBS, and what I got was the same level of
    disinformation that I get from the network on Iraq, which may be why
    the competing Judge Judy is so much more widely watched.

    To the program on San Diego:

    The ex-superintendent so nicely presented by Merrow, Alan Bersin, is :
    (a ) liberal Democrat of the Clinton stripe and very close
    to the Clintons,
    (b) married to a very wealthy woman who is the daughter of a
    big local developer
    (c) the former US Attorney here who took credit for
    constructing the massive border fence and then went directly to
    become SD schools boss
    (d) the promoter of the Blueprint, his project that first
    caused the dismissal of every classroom aide in SD, thus cutting the
    only line of communication many teachers had with kids and parents
    and, later, wiped out nearly everything from the curriculum but math
    and reading, each topic rigidly structured with scripted formats
    overseen by low level bosses with clipboards who lorded over
    classroom teachers making sure the best of them left, and the others
    were on script
    (e) poured money into his corrupt out of town pals who made
    millions from doing bogus training for SD educators, slime like Tony
    Alvarado, a thief who initiated his work in NYC
    (f) carried on a phony war with the SDEA teachers union
    which rolled over and over for him while he carried on a real war
    with honest school board member Francis Zimmerman, a courageous and
    persevering woman whose insight was key to maintaining a modicum of
    sanity in the system---Bersin helped organize a $`1/2 million dollar
    campaign to drive her off the board (he lost)
    (G) went on to become the Boss Of Education in CA, under the
    Gropenfuhrer, and later quit to become part of the San Diego Airport
    Board here which is designed to ram through a new airport on behalf
    of developers, an airport the mass of citizens rejected in a recent
    vote by about 2/1.

    Alan Bersin is a fascist in every sense of the word. He made his
    stake in creating borders between people based on nation, wealth,
    race, and achieved it by heaping one lie on the next, while profiting
    handsomely. And he is a very hard worker.

    Carl Cohn, the new boss of the SD school system, chose not to
    interview, but he is seen as a good fellow and the union likes him as
    he opposes charters, talks to them cordially, etc. Cohn last school
    year was behind a week long "Support Our Troops Surge" in the SD city
    schools, holding demonstrations, parties, and forcing teachers to
    have kids fill out support our troops cards, underwritten by war
    profiteers. SD teachers delivered thousands of those cards---to my
    house, somehow lost in the system. Cohn is the velvet glove over the
    iron fist of fascism. He recently appointed a former Navy boss to run
    the school system's accounting system, to oversee the lawns and
    gardeners, to look after the busses---and run special ed.

    It is true that Gompers School and Keiller School (now Keiller
    Leadership Academy) were terrible schools. I visited them both,
    often, during my time at SDSU (the provider of most teachers in the
    area, really a mediocre community college as reflected in the
    policies and programs where racism, ignorance, opportunism, and
    cowardice guide the devotion of the university to market forces). I
    met with a lot of teachers in both schools. In addition, I still know
    people in those schools, and people who have subbed there as well.
    One very experienced sub said to me, "Keiller is the worst school I
    have ever entered and I will never go back." That was before the charter.

    It is true that some teachers in those two schools were terrible
    teachers, working just for the paycheck, racist to the core. It is
    also true that their classes often had 40 plus kids in them, that
    they schools were completely segregated, the kids living not in what
    Teach For America calls "Under=resourced Areas," but in
    super-exploited communities hit by racism and the birthright that
    produces: no capital. It is true that books and supplies were
    problems. It is correct to say that fights on the campus of Gompers
    were routine, that each campus was incredibly overcrowded and kids
    roamed, hoods up, in what looked like seething masses throughout the day.

    Today, with the cooperation of many people in the community, parents,
    and teachers, those schools are much more highly regimented, uniforms
    are inspected, kids sometimes march between classes (typical in all
    of CA's poor schools as far as I have seen), and order is maintained.
    Test scores went up, a bit, but it is far too early to say, by the
    measures of elites, that anything has happened at all regarding
    pedagogy or substance---except that kids and parents are deeply
    involved in creating their own oppression, and liking it--another
    aspect of fascism. But Merrow says this is success.

    It may be true that the younger teaching force at Gompers and Keiller
    are more dedicated than their predecessors. We shall see about that
    in, say, five years. Note that very few teachers in Gompers have
    taught more than three years. As most of them would be untenured, it
    would have been very hard, in my experience, for Merrow to find open
    dissenters. Gompers remains completely segregated, 3 percent white.
    You can get a good education in a completely segregated school? For what?

    It is reasonable to say that the younger Gompers teaching force, many
    of the SDSU or CSU grads, probably is much less prepared to know
    their social context than their predecessors. After all, CSU liberal
    studies grads never encounter a history class that takes them beyond
    1912 unless they can afford the time and money to take electives.
    Moreover, SDSU grads operated within a university system that is
    racist to the core ("Aztecs?" ) and they move through the teacher ed
    program in segregated blocks where, in the words of one block leader,
    "we do not allow newcomers as they might interrupt the social norms
    and trust of our group." The policies and programs of teacher ed look
    like training for advanced slave overseers. Still, a few current
    grads land on their feet, maintain some ideals, and try to teach.

    Merrow then goes to the question of money and charters, demonstrating
    that charters take money from "public," schools. But San Diego's
    charters are public schools, and the public schools of San Diego,
    while more orderly than Detroit's, are abject failures, even those in
    rich Lajolla, simply the other side of the segregation coin. Racist
    schools are terrible schools.

    But schools which systematically teach lies to kids (we are all
    together with common interests in this nation, for example), using
    methods so obscure that the tactics of learning become impossible to
    unravel, and hence kids learn not to like to learn, are the norm in
    San Diego as well as in the US, and that is even worse.

    I believe that some charters, like Susan Harmon's now shut down
    Growing Children, could really do some vital work, but the left, what
    of it there is, has failed to recognize this likely to be brief
    opening. In any case, the dispute between San Diego Charters, and the
    District, is simply a falling out among thieves.

    What did Merrow really see at Gompers and Keiller? He saw ORDER.
    Unless he is incredibly obtuse, he could not possibly suggest that
    there is better teaching, that scores are up, that kids care more
    about learning. What he saw was uniforms, an absence of unruliness,
    less kids expelled or suspended from what are really missions for the
    system of capital, factories for lies: order. That, he likes.

    So, what Merrow saw as progress, for the most part, was the emergence
    of fascism. What else should I expect from PBS?

    On to a new school year, full of hope. No kidding.

    — Rich Gibson
    e-mail
    2007-08-16
    http://www.rougeforum.org


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.