Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    The great WASL scam

    Mothers Against WASL have launched SPONSOR A SENIOR; SAVE A DIPLOMA. Join them in this historic legal action on behalf of the students in the class of 2008 who are threatened with denied diplomas because of Washington’s exit exam.

    By David Marshak

    Terry Bergeson, superintendent of public instruction, proudly crows
    that about 84 percent of the current senior class in Washington high
    schools has passed both the reading and writing portions of the
    Washington Assessment of Student Learning required for graduation in
    June 2008.

    Bergeson said, "Kids are stepping up to the plate. ... The train
    wreck everyone has been imagining, it's not going to happen. Kids are
    going to do it."

    Eighty-four percent passing — sounds great, right? But Bergeson is
    not telling us the whole story with this figure. Also, it's hard to
    know what's actually happening because the Office of the
    Superintendent of Public Instruction Web site provides contradictory
    data.

    Let's begin with OSPI's grade-level-enrollment figures from October
    2006, the most recent numbers posted on the site. According to these
    tables, there were 90,444 ninth-graders in Washington public schools
    that month and only 77, 242 12th-graders. Comparing a state's ninth-
    grade enrollment with its 12th-grade enrollment provides what's
    called a school attrition rate. It's not a precise measure of
    dropouts, because the number of students in each grade varies from
    year to year. However, it does give a general sense of what's going
    on.

    These figures show 13,202 more ninth-graders than 12th-graders, which
    suggests that about 15 percent of the students are leaving school
    between the start of ninth grade and the start of 12th grade. This
    fits roughly with the official dropout rate as listed by OSPI: 5.7
    percent per year. Three years times 5.7 equals 17.1 percent.

    However, this figure is almost certainly too low to be accurate, as
    I'll explain in a moment. Nonetheless, even if we accepted this as
    valid — a 17-percent attrition rate in the class of 2008 — it blows a
    considerable hole in Bergeson's claim of WASL victory.

    Using this figure as a baseline, of the students entering ninth grade
    in 2004 — the class of 2008 — only 84 percent of the 83 percent of
    the students still in school in 2007 have passed the WASL for
    graduation. That means that 70 percent of the class has passed the
    WASL, not 84 percent.

    But, even this percentage is not credible. On the same OSPI Web site,
    the state's "on-time graduation rate" is listed as 70 percent. That
    number suggests that many fewer students in the original class of
    2008 are headed toward on-time graduation.

    Multiple studies about dropout rates have been conducted in recent
    years both nationally and in Washington. Just about every study of
    this sort has found that every state's chief school officer —
    Bergeson in Washington — understates the actual high-school-dropout
    rate. One study funded by the Gates Foundation found Washington's
    graduation rate to be 67 percent. This means that 33 percent of
    students dropped out. Other studies have found a little bit higher
    percentage of graduates.

    Let's take OSPI's own claim and see how it plays out. Seventy percent
    of students graduate on time; 30 percent don't. We know that most
    students who drop out do so before they get to 12th grade. Very few
    students achieve senior status and then drop out. Just to be on the
    safe side, let's allow for some seniors to quit during 12th grade and
    say that 72 percent of the original class of 2008 are included in the
    current roster of seniors.

    If we take 84 percent — the passing rate — of the 72 percent of the
    students included in Bergeson's count, this means that only about 60
    percent of the original members of the class of 2008 have passed the
    WASL.

    When you have 40 percent of your kids failing, it's hard to see why
    Bergeson is claiming victory. Forty percent of our kids failing is
    very bad news indeed.

    Bergeson's tactic of ignoring the entire class of 2008 — and focusing
    only on the 70 percent or so who made it to the 12th grade on time —
    unfortunately is typical of too many chief state school officers.
    Massachusetts claims a 95 percent passing rate on its graduation
    tests, even though 30 percent of its kids drop out. Texas has claimed
    85 percent passing, even though its most recent school attrition rate
    is 34 percent.

    Standards-and-testing — the Essential Academic Learning
    Requirements/WASL system — was supposed to deliver "world-class
    schooling" for all kids. That was the original promise. Then Bergeson
    amended it to only 80 percent of the kids. Now she's claiming victory
    even though only about 60 percent of the kids are likely to pass the
    WASL and graduate on time.

    Is this really a great achievement after 14 years and who knows how
    many hundreds of millions of dollars spent on testing? And, are our
    schools not pretty much where we were in 1992 before we started with
    this unproven yet very expensive obsession with standards and high-
    stakes testing?

    And, by the way, it's now almost 2008. Google — or voice-recognition
    software — is at every child's fingertips. Does it really make any
    sense any longer to try to compel our digitally native kids all to
    learn the same stuff?

    is an emeritus professor in the College of Education at
    Seattle University.

    — David Marshak
    Seattle Times
    2007-11-20


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.