Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    School chiefs' pay on sharp curve up

    Ohanian Comment: This is not the sort of story I notice. I rarely pay any attention to what people make--unless it isn't a living wage. THAT I care about.

    I read once that we're all stuck in our high school hair styles. I wonder, too, if $30,000 still sounds like a LOT to me because I, an editorial aide at an advertising agency, thought it was a windfall when I was paid $7,000 at my first teaching job.

    Be that as it may, there are a number of interesting things in this article, and I leave it to you to decide where the outrages lie. I do have my own opinion.

    I consider the job of school superintendent to be a very difficult one. But to make $374,496 in a district with 2,000 students seems quite phenomenal, even over the top. I have worked in schools with a larger population. Of course, Winetka IS the affluent home of the famed New Trier High School. In 2007, Winnetka was ranked by CNN Money as having the 4th highest average household income in the country, so maybe it's fitting that they reward the school superintendent accordingly.

    Note the quote from the fellow who says that the superintendency "doesn't have any competitive pressures on it at all." HE's reportedly worth $100 million, but that's another story.


    By Mary Ann Fergus
    reporters Darnell Little and Liam Ford contributed to this report.

    School superintendents' average pay in Illinois climbed 23 percent in the last five years, a jump experts said reflects an increasingly competitive market and a number of retirees with big end-of-career raises.

    The 10 highest-paid school superintendents in Illinois each earned more than $300,000 and oversaw small to large districts in the Chicago metropolitan area, according to state data.

    "It is one of the most difficult jobs out there -- anywhere -- and certainly in public education, so you need to have someone who is very experienced," said Michael Lipsitz, school board president of Highland Park-based District 112 where the superintendent last year was the 10th highest paid in the state.

    "And, frankly, there aren't a whole lot of people out there who meet those standards who are interested in making a move."

    The 2006-07 salary data, obtained from the Illinois State Board of Education through the Freedom of Information Act, reflects self-reported information from 810 of the 871 school districts in the state.

    The data showed that average superintendent salary and retirement benefits in Illinois went from about $114,000 in the 2001-02 school year to $141,000 in 2006-07. Another sign of the increased wages: 119 top school chiefs earned $200,000 or more last year compared with 26 in 2001-02.

    The salary data may include retirement contributions, bonuses, annuities, compensation for unused vacation days and retirement incentives, according to the state board.

    Some superintendents said their pay also reflects that they fill more than one role -- often also serving as a business manager or school principal.

    Half of the top 10 earners retired at the end of the last school year and others on the list are near retirement.

    Many of those who retired were exempt from a 2005 state law designed to rein in on hefty end-of-career raises because their contracts pre-dated its passage.

    The law imposes an additional cost on school districts for salary increases above 6 percent during the period used to determine pension benefits, typically the last four years of a contract.

    Some experts suggested the law may not have a large effect on local districts or the state retirement system over the long run. Search consultants have already seen candidates ask for more compensation at the onset in light of the law as well as a smaller pool of applicants nationwide.

    "The 6 percent is having the reverse effect of what they had hoped," said Michael Johnson, executive director of the Illinois Association of School Boards. "It's pushed the beginning salaries up considerably."

    The state data show a wide range of salaries, reflecting such variables as community resources and experience. Three of the top 10 earners last year ran one-school districts.

    Chicago schools chief Arne Duncan, meanwhile, ranked far below others though he wasn't listed on the state data. Duncan, who oversees 640 schools and 410,000 students, earned $208,316 in salary and retirement benefits last year, a spokesman said.

    Hinsdale tops list

    The top-paid superintendent in the state last year, Mary Curley, made $385,379 as chief of the nine-school Hinsdale-based Community Consolidated School District 181 before retiring at year's end.

    Just below her, Rebecca van der Bogert earned $374,496 as chief of Winnetka School District 36.

    School board president Penny Lanphier said van der Bogert's salary reflects her retirement at year's end. The district has three elementary schools and two middle schools with a total of more than 2,000 pupils.

    Van der Bogert's salary more than doubled -- for an increase of $190,823 -- since 2002 when she earned $183,000. Lanphier said the chief's salary has never been an issue.

    "Our community is one where people move here for the school districts," Lanphier said. "They have a very high level of expectation of what the schools will be."

    Supt. Dennis Kelly of LaGrange-based Lyons Township High School District 204 ranked third at $356,621. Kelly is the highest paid administrator from last year who is still on the job.

    Scheduled to retire in 2009 after 42 years in education, Kelly said the salary reflects a $16,000 federal grant payment for running a model teacher recruitment program in the state and $23,000 out-of-state pension credit from a former job.

    "People will say, 'Wow, nice salary, Dr. Kelly,' but usually when they tell me that, it's at a school event and they know that I'm working 75 to 80 hours a week," Kelly said.

    Salary small slice of budget

    Ron Gidwitz, a former Republican gubernatorial candidate and former head of the State Board of Education, said the superintendent's salary is a small portion of a district's budget. A competitive salary, he said, is justified for top performing schools.

    "It's more about how responsible the school board has been in overseeing taxpayers' money," Gidwitz said. "If you have a great superintendent who is doing a great job, pay him what you can pay him."

    Though some activists said salaries are too high, superintendents contend that their jobs are similar to those of corporate chief executive officers.

    "Comparing it to business is really silly," said Jack Roeser, chairman of Family Taxpayers Network, which publishes annual teacher and superintendent salaries online every year. "It doesn't have any competitive pressures on it at all. If they were a business, they would all be out of business."

    William Mulvaney, of Armstrong Township High School District 225, said he doesn't mind being the state's lowest-paid superintendent.

    Mulvaney is paid $50,000 to oversee one high school of about 205 students in Vermilion County. But the survey doesn't reflect that last year he took on a second job, running the nearby one-school elementary district of about 109 pupils where he earned another $50,000.

    "In our profession, it's the 'haves' and 'have nots,'" said Mulvaney, who also was the high school boys basketball coach.

    "Most small rural districts are struggling to stay financially solvent, so they can't afford to keep up with the big salaries that a lot of [superintendents] are making."

    — Mary Ann Fergus
    Chicago Tribune
    2007-12-13


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.