Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Conservatives will revive rejected curriculum plan

    The Texas Freedom Network's subhead on its banner reads A Mainstream Voice to Counter the Religious Right. The organization has been instrumental in defeating initiatives backed by the religious right in Texas, including private school vouchers, textbook censorship and faith-based deregulation.

    By Gary Scharrer and Jennifer Radcliffe

    AUSTIN — A group of conservatives on the State Board of Education is expected to make an 11th-hour move today to scrap two years of work on a language arts curriculum revision in favor of a plan that was rejected more than a decade ago.

    Some on the divided, 15-member board contend that the proposed curriculum backed by the Texas Education Agency is too vague and not worth the $85,000 the state paid the nonprofit group that developed it.

    "It's unreadable. It's mangled. It's confusing," said board member David Bradley, who represents the Beaumont area.

    Others contend that introducing the alternative curriculum at this late date is an attempt to push a "right-wing agenda" that will harm public education.

    They say that, in addition to disregarding years of work by a board-appointed committee of Texas educators, introducing an alternative document gives teachers very little time to weigh in.

    "What I'm upset about is, how could we involve teachers and then leave them out of the loop? This is absurd," said board member Mary Helen Berlanga, of Corpus Christi. "I want teachers to be outraged that they are not being heard."

    Judy Wallis, the language arts director in the Spring Branch district, said she is stunned that this alternative curriculum has resurfaced.

    "I don't know what to say. We're all troubled, a little mystified and surprised," said Wallis, who plans to testify at the meeting in Austin today.

    The alternative curriculum puts more emphasis on handwriting, grammar, spelling and punctuation. It also includes a suggested reading list, a contentious point among many educators, Bradley said. Texas is revising all of its curricula, the documents that spell out what children are taught.

    Up against a tight April deadline for approving the new language arts curriculum, the state asked for help last fall from StandardsWork, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit group.

    Some board members were dissatisfied with a draft that the group submitted in January.

    "I think everybody just groaned," Bradley said.

    He added that this alternative curriculum was nearly adopted in 1997, when conservatives were unhappy with the TEA's version. There was little they could do then, Bradley said, because then-Gov. George W. Bush and his political director, Karl Rove, "pushed it through because we had to reform education in Texas."

    The principal author of the 1997 document is retired English teacher Donna Garner.

    "We don't need input from a person who retired many years ago and thinks this document that she submitted 10 years ago is still good enough today," Berlanga said. "They are dictating what to read. They are not even saying, 'These are some examples.' They are saying, 'This is what you are going to read to them.'"

    In an e-mail message to supporters last week, Garner complained that students no longer read traditional classics.

    "They cannot write nor speak using correct grammar," she wrote. "Students' spelling and vocabulary skills have disintegrated. Multicultural authors have taken the place of time-honored classics in students' textbooks. Students spend class time reading teen genre which is replete with violence, sexual content and abusive language.

    "Diversity now includes homosexuals. The gay lifestyle is being heavily promoted in our public schools," Garner wrote. "Schools cannot afford to hire enough policemen to control student violence."

    Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, criticized state board Chairman Don McLeroy for trying to cast aside two years of work.

    Her organization, which offers itself as a counterbalance to religious conservatives, is a frequent critic of the state board.

    Miller said McLeroy "is trying to do this with a last-minute bait-and-switch, offering a curriculum document that the board, parents and teachers haven't even discussed. The arrogance is breathtaking."

    — Gary Scharrer and Jennifer Radcliffe
    Houston Chronicle
    2008-02-13
    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5537026.html


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.