Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Rhee's 'Plan B' Targets Teacher Quality: Strategy Might Include New Evaluation Process, Linking Licenses to Classroom Performance

    From Charlie Rose to Katie
    Couric to Newsweek, she has become the national
    media's go-to figure for discussions of what
    ails big-city schools.


    Further evidence of the shallowness of the
    national media who reveal themselves to be in
    the corporate pocket on every issue from
    education to the environment.


    By Bill Turque

    Schools Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee is
    preparing to bypass the Washington Teachers'
    Union in pursuit of the objective she considers
    essential to overhauling the District's public
    schools: the power to fire at will teachers she
    deems ineffective.

    What she calls "Plan B" involves a more
    aggressive use of powers she already has and
    that are not subject to contract negotiations
    with the union. These could include
    strengthening the existing system of annual
    personnel evaluations that spell out procedures
    for terminating teachers.

    Rhee is also positioned to benefit from a
    potentially groundbreaking revision that has
    unfolded largely outside public view during
    contract talks. It would make the District
    school system one of the few in the country to
    link the licensing of teachers to their
    classroom performance, rather than their
    academic credentials. New rules, scheduled to
    go into effect this week, would grant State
    Superintendent of Education Deborah A. Gist the
    discretion to create an advanced teaching
    credential specifying the bench marks
    instructors would have to meet to keep their
    jobs.

    Speaking to a roundtable of education writers
    on Friday, Rhee declined to discuss her
    alternative path in detail, except to say that
    it had "multiple facets." She said she wanted
    to make changes in collaboration with the union
    -- and in a way that teachers would profit
    financially -- but that she was prepared to
    move ahead unilaterally.

    "The contract is the way that I would prefer to
    go," Rhee said. "But if we can't get to
    agreement on the contract, there's another very
    clear way that we can get there. . . . The
    bottom line is we are going to bring
    accountability in a very significant way to the
    educator force in this school district."

    Since mid-July, Rhee has tried to sell union
    leaders and the rank and file on a proposal
    that would propel salaries to more than
    $100,000 annually in pay and performance
    bonuses for many teachers. But in exchange, she
    insists that they relinquish tenure and spend a
    year on probation -- risking dismissal.
    Instructors have the option of keeping tenure
    and accepting lower raises. New hires would
    have no choice, remaining on the probation
    griddle for four years, twice as long as the
    current requirement.

    The pay proposal, along with a slew of other
    initiatives, has turned Rhee into a national
    standard-bearer for urban school reform and, in
    particular, a champion for those who regard
    teachers' unions as the most significant
    obstacle to progress. From Charlie Rose to
    Katie Couric to Newsweek, she has become
    the national media's go-to figure for
    discussions of what ails big-city schools.

    Rhee had once hoped to wrap up a contract by
    June, but as national and local acolytes look
    on, she has been unable to build a consensus
    among teachers, who remain sharply divided over
    the pay plan. As contract talks continue, she
    is pressing George Parker, president of the
    teachers' union, to bring the salary package to
    a membership vote. So far, he has resisted.

    In recent weeks, Rhee has moved to defuse
    expectations surrounding the contract and novel
    pay package. Asked earlier this year by Fast
    Company magazine what happens if she fails to
    get the labor deal she wants, Rhee replied,
    "Then I'm screwed." But at Friday's roundtable,
    she suggested that "Plan B" could have a
    national impact as far-reaching as the pay plan
    because it would show other cities a path to
    reform that does not require winning over
    unions and spending millions more on raises.

    Rhee's ultimate goal is clear: to weed the
    District's instructional corps of
    underperformers and remake it, at least in
    part, with younger, highly energized graduates
    of such alternative training programs as Teach
    for America, where she began her career. Unlike
    many tenured Washington teachers, those
    emerging from such programs are unlikely to
    invest their entire working lives in education.
    But they will, in Rhee's estimation, be more
    inclined to embrace her core message: that
    children can learn no matter what economic and
    social conditions they face beyond the
    classroom, and that teachers should be held
    directly accountable for their progress through
    test scores and other measurements.

    Without union buy-in, however, Rhee faces a
    longer, harder slog, which might involve
    changes in teacher licensure.

    Under current D.C. rules, a teacher can receive
    a standard license by completing a college- or
    university-based teacher education program and
    passing Praxis, a teacher exam. It is renewable
    every five years upon completion of six credit
    hours of course work or 90 hours in
    professional development workshops.

    Gist, who as state superintendent can set
    professional standards, has proposed amending
    the District's municipal regulations to make
    most licenses non-renewable. Teachers would be
    required to get a new "advanced teaching
    credential" by demonstrating classroom
    effectiveness through criteria she will
    determine during the next six to 12 months. Her
    plan would also broaden the range of accepted
    teacher education programs to include such
    nonprofit groups as Teach for America.

    The proposed rules would give Rhee "maximum
    flexibility in selecting and placing
    candidates," according to a PowerPoint
    presentation on the state superintendent's Web
    site.

    Gist has been working on the revisions through
    the rulemaking process, which does not require
    review by the D.C. Council or the D.C. State
    Board of Education. The revisions were posted
    on the D.C. Register Aug. 8 and become
    effective this week. Parker said he had no idea
    what Rhee's "Plan B" entails but that any
    attempt to use the licensing process to weaken
    tenure protections was unacceptable.

    "It really appears to be a backdoor process of
    firing teachers," said Parker, who sent an e-
    mail to most of the District's 4,000 teachers
    last week warning them of the proposal.

    He added that there is no evidence that the
    proposed revisions would apply to non-unionized
    charter schools. "If this is so important, how
    come it doesn't apply to charter schools?"

    Parker said he had no indication that Gist and
    Rhee, who meet regularly, were acting in a
    concerted fashion to develop the new licensure
    rules.

    Asked for an interview last Wednesday, Gist
    said she first had to receive clearance from
    Carrie Brooks, Mayor Adrian M. Fenty's chief of
    staff. Gist, who reports to the mayor, did not
    respond to the request. Brooks did not return a
    phone message.

    Rhee is free to unilaterally overhaul the
    school system's "Professional Performance
    Evaluation Process," and even Parker readily
    acknowledges that it needs work.

    Instructors judged by principals to be
    underperforming can be placed on a 90-day
    "improvement plan" and assigned a "helping
    teacher." What follows during the three months
    is a series of classroom observations, each of
    which must be preceded by a principal-teacher
    "pre-conference" and then a follow-up meeting.
    All must take place within precise time frames,
    a challenge for often harried, distracted
    administrators.

    "You blow one deadline, you go back to ground
    zero," said one principal, who asked for
    anonymity because she was speaking without
    authorization. She said she has used the 90-day
    plan just once in nearly a decade.

    Asked last month how many tenured teachers the
    District fired for poor performance last year,
    former Rhee spokeswoman Mafara Hobson initially
    said only one. She subsequently said the number
    was not correct but did not provide a revised
    total.

    Union leaders say administrative bungling and
    principals with little expertise in evaluating
    teachers enable the union to reverse many
    firings through the appeals process.

    "It's very poorly implemented," Parker said.
    "This is what frustrates m

    — Bill Turque
    Washington Post
    2008-09-18


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.