Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Delighted -- or Deflated -- by Dollars D.C. Students Get First Reward Checks, but Some Come Up Short

    Ohanian Comment: The
    Post ran a poll when they published an
    earlier story on this topic. People answered a
    resounding 76% "No" to the question of whether
    this is a good idea. Twenty per cent said
    "Yes."

    Such a project comes as no surprise: it is part
    of the Business Model which insists that money
    rules. People who themselves are motivated by
    money assume that's what drives everybody else.
    I admit to being startled to learn that
    "Harvard University" is printed on the check.
    So now students associate Harvard with money. I
    guess that's the point. Why was I surprised?

    Note who the big funder is: The Broad
    Foundation. With Broad's help, the Inequality
    Lab is pulling this same stunt in New York
    City. Wherever there's a pile of Business Model
    offal, you'll find Broad.

    People who care about students' school success
    should read Edward Deci before they start
    handing out the cash:

    Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally
    mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
    Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology,
    18, 105-115.

    Deci, E. L. (1972a). Effects of contingent and
    non-contingent rewards and controls on
    intrinsic motivation. Organizational
    Behavior and Human Performance,
    8, 217-229.

    Deci, E. L. (1972b). Intrinsic motivation,
    extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity.
    Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology,
    22, 113-120.

    Deci's groundbreaking work showed that
    extrinsic rewards such as monetary payments
    undermine people?s intrinsic motivation for the
    rewarded activity. Since his early
    investigations, more than 100 studies have been
    done which support his findings. Read Alfie
    Kohn for convincing updates. Kohn's classic
    Punished by Rewards challenges the
    widely held assumption that incentives lead to
    improved quality and increased output in the
    workplace and in schools. And if people think
    Deci's studies are too outdated, Kohn's work is
    heavily documented with up-to-date
    studies.


    By Bill Turque and N.C. Aizenman

    The District's experimental program to pay
    3,300 middle school students for good grades
    and behavior is filled with valuable life
    lessons about hard work, thrift and showing up
    on time, its supporters say.

    And on yesterday's first payday under the
    "Capital Gains" plan, kids at the 15 eligible
    schools cashed in. They earned a total of
    $137,813 from the initiative, a joint venture
    of the District and Harvard University.
    Students can earn a maximum of $100 every two
    weeks. The average award yesterday was $43.

    Unfortunately, students at Shaw at Garnet-
    Patterson got a lesson officials hadn't planned
    on: Your check might not be as hefty as you
    expected.

    Although students received credit for reaching
    achievement targets in reading, math and
    science, a computer error shorted them on
    attendance and behavior. Dena Iverson, a
    spokeswoman for Schools Chancellor Michelle A.
    Rhee, said the problem appeared to be unique to
    Shaw, but at least one other school, Whittier,
    also reported problems. Iverson said the
    students will get the money they are due in
    their next check.

    Shaw Principal Brian Betts did his best to make
    it a teachable moment.

    "Mr. Betts once had a job where he didn't get
    paid for four weeks," he told teacher Brian
    Diamond's sixth-grade homeroom as he
    distributed the checks.

    Reactions varied widely, with some students
    bounding down the school steps on 10th Street
    NW near U Street, waving checks at each other
    and shrieking: "What d'you get? What d'you get?
    "

    Others sat quietly and studied the pale green
    checks with "Harvard University" in boldface
    across the top. Sixth-grader Kevin Sparrow-Bey,
    who took in $20, said he was annoyed by the
    assumption that he and his classmates have to
    be paid to take school seriously.

    "I can do the work," said Kevin, 11, who said
    he gets B's and C's. "It don't change nothing."

    Shaw teachers and administrators said the
    program has had a limited impact so far: A
    downward spike in tardiness is the most
    noticeable change, but what it does to grades
    will take longer to determine. They also said
    that until yesterday, the program was pretty
    much an abstraction to many students. As
    awareness of the system spreads, officials
    expect the payouts to grow. By next month, the
    money will be electronically deposited in
    individual bank accounts, they said.

    Betts said that when students begin to see the
    money every two weeks -- and the direct
    relationship between what they are paid and
    what they do in school -- the effect will be
    more widespread.

    "That's when the power of this program will
    surface," Betts said.

    Some students said yesterday that it had
    already raised the level of their academic
    game.

    Avontae Matthews, 12, said she had worked extra
    hard for her $40. "I participated in all my
    classes -- even gym. . . . I raised my hand in
    social studies, and I paid more attention in
    math," she said.

    Although in most cases the missing amounts were
    small, some students had been looking forward
    to a bigger payoff for their good work.

    "I only got $10. I should have gotten way
    more," said Tarae Graham, 13, a seventh-grader.

    "Yeah, this whole thing is really messed up,"
    agreed Dominique Watson, 13, who received a
    check for $28.

    One special education teacher tried to console
    students by telling them she was still waiting
    to be paid by the District for training
    sessions she attended over the summer.

    "So we feel the same way," she said.

    Capital Gains was created by Roland G. Fryer
    Jr., a Harvard University economist and
    researcher for the school's American Inequality
    Lab, which studies poverty and race. Fryer, who
    grew up poor in Daytona Beach, Fla., and
    dropped out of high school for a time to deal
    drugs, is searching for ways to close the
    academic achievement gap between minority and
    white students.

    The middle school years are especially
    critical, Fryer and other researchers say,
    because it is the period when achievement often
    declines. Studies show that many high school
    dropouts actually finalize their decision to
    leave during middle school.

    At a morning assembly in the Shaw school gym,
    Fryer joined Rhee and Mayor Adrian M. Fenty in
    a kickoff ceremony, presenting a group of
    students with a giant ceremonial check for
    $4,538 -- representing the amount students had
    earned.

    "Today is about you," Fryer said to the
    students, pointing to a row of television
    cameras. He told them "the whole world was
    watching" to see whether the program can work.

    Half of the $2.7 million for the year-long
    pilot program comes from the District, and half
    comes from a grant to Harvard by the Broad
    Foundation.

    School incentive programs are not new. The
    Dallas school system pays students to read
    books. Many schools, including KIPP Key Academy
    charter school in the District, offer fake
    money that can be redeemed for small gifts at a
    school store.

    But Fryer says no one has used rigorous social
    science methods to determine whether incentives
    make a significant difference. He has launched
    programs similar to Capital Gains in Chicago
    and New York, where about 8,500 fourth- and
    seventh-graders are receiving cash based on
    standardized test scores.

    His work has kindled a vigorous debate among
    parents and education scholars about the
    propriety of cash for grades. Fryer said such
    efforts are no silver bullet for the problems
    of big urban school districts. But ultimately,
    he said in a recent interview, progress will
    come in a series of small solutions, not one
    big fix.

    Asked what they planned to do with their money,
    Shaw kids had every kind of answer. Jai Carson,
    13, the school's star running back, said he
    planned to buy shoes for his cousin.

    "I know some people who dropped out of school
    because they didn't have any money," he said.

    Avontae, a seventh-grader, said she wasn't sure
    what she wanted to buy with the money, but she
    knew where she planned to spend it. "I'm going
    to the mall!" she announced loudly to whoops of
    approval from her girlfriends.

    James Patterson, 14, an eighth-grader who did
    not get a check, said watching so many of his
    friends get paid made him want to try harder in
    school.

    "I was suspended last week. But I'm definitely
    going to try to do good now, you know, like not
    talking in class," he said.

    Sixth-grader Emilio Molina seemed particularly
    deflated as he stepped into his father's blue
    Toyota Corolla. For the last several weeks, he
    had been doing his homework with extra verve.

    "He always does it," said his father, Carlos
    Molina. "But he was so much more enthusiastic.
    As soon as he'd get home, he'd be like, 'Can I
    use the computer?' He was so excited to earn
    that money."

    So even though Emilio's $46 check was among the
    highest, it came as something of a letdown to
    Emilio.

    "I thought it was going to be more like $100,"
    he mumbled. Not that he plans to slack off at
    school now. Money has its attractions, but his
    true motivation is loftier, he said. "I really
    want to get into a good college."

    Staff writers David Betancourt and Hamil R.
    Harris contributed to this report.




    — Bill Turque and N.C. Aizenman
    Washington Post
    2008-10-18


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.