Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Obama Praises His Education-Secretary Choice for Relying on Data to Improve Schools

    Ohanian Comment:
    This writer claims The choice met with
    virtually unanimous acclaim. . . .

    Acclaim from whom (besides Margaret Spelling)?

  • not Chicago teachers

  • not Chicago parents

  • not from anybody who knows anything about
    education at the grassroots level


  • Nobody asked a Chicago teacher/parent who is
    busy scraping the "Another teacher for Obama"
    sticker off her bumper.

    Obama's choice is another in the line of
    corporate crony appointees in his cabinet. As
    George Schmidt has been documenting in
    Substance, ever since Duncan's
    appointment by Mayor Daley in 2001, "Duncan has
    presided over more 'no bid' contracts from
    contractors (for everything from buildings and
    computer hardward and software to charter
    schools) in the history of the City of Chicago
    and its public schools."

    "Since Duncan became CEO, he has eliminated
    2,000 black teachers from Chicago's teaching
    force, undoing decades of desegregation and
    affirmative action in the name of 'school
    reform."

    And more. Subscribe to Substance. Send $16 to
    Substance
    5132 W. Berteau Avenue
    Chicago, IL 60641-1440

    Arm yourself with information. Join the
    resistance.

    Data is useless when it is, like DIBELS,
    garbage in/garbage out.

    We need to be vocal about the fact that the
    Data Emperor has no clothes.

    By Paul Basken

    Washington

    President-elect Barack Obama said on Tuesday he
    values his choice for education secretary, Arne
    Duncan, for his dogged determination to use
    data to drive his decisions about how he sought
    to improve the Chicago Public Schools.

    “When faced with tough decisions, Arne doesn’t
    blink,” Mr. Obama said as he presented Mr.
    Duncan, the chief executive of Chicago's
    public-school system, as his choice to run the
    Education Department. “He’s not beholden to any
    one ideology, and he doesn’t hesitate for one
    minute to do what needs to be done.”

    The choice met with virtually unanimous
    acclaim, even among Republicans and teachers'-
    union leaders who chafed at some of Mr.
    Duncan’s plans to overhaul Chicago's schools
    but have said they appreciated the respect he
    showed them in the process of finding
    compromise.

    National higher-education leaders joined in the
    praise, saying they hoped Mr. Duncan’s record
    in Chicago of emphasizing cooperation over
    confrontation will also characterize his
    relations with colleges when he gets to
    Washington.

    “He demonstrated effective leadership at the K-
    through-12 level and has a clear appreciation
    for, and connection to, higher education,” said
    William E. Kirwan, chancellor of the University
    System of Maryland. “So it just seems to me
    that it’s a great choice.”

    If he is confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Mr.
    Duncan, 44, would be the ninth U.S. secretary
    of education. Like most of his predecessors in
    that job, Mr. Duncan has gained the bulk of his
    experience in elementary and secondary
    education. He has led the Chicago public-school
    system, the third largest in the nation, for
    seven years.

    Focus on Children's Education

    Mr. Duncan made no specific reference to higher
    education when he appeared with Mr. Obama in
    Chicago on Tuesday. The two delivered brief
    remarks at the Dodge Renaissance Academy, a
    public school that was considered failing but
    that Mr. Duncan helped transform into an
    academy where children are taught by candidates
    seeking advanced degrees in education.

    Mr. Obama made only a passing reference to
    higher education in his introduction of Mr.
    Duncan at the event. The president-elect
    mentioned his belief that “college degrees must
    be within the reach of all.”

    The focus on elementary- and secondary-school
    issues mostly reflects political reality, said
    Michael J. Petrilli, who served as an associate
    assistant deputy secretary in the Education
    Department during President Bush’s first term.

    The federal government may have a greater
    policy responsibility in the higher-education
    arena than in the elementary- and secondary-
    education realm, but voters are mostly
    concerned about education as it involves
    elementary and secondary schools, Mr. Petrilli
    said. And politicians respond to that.

    “Maybe the higher-education community should
    look at this as a compliment,” said Mr.
    Petrilli, who is now vice president for
    national programs and policy at the Thomas B.
    Fordham Foundation, a Washington policy-study
    group. “Most Americans think that the higher-
    education system works pretty well.”

    On Tuesday, Mr. Obama emphasized his pride in
    Mr. Duncan, a personal friend and partner in
    pickup basketball, for improvements in test
    scores seen in Chicago schools since he took
    over in 2001. The proportion of elementary-
    school students meeting federally mandated
    testing standards rose to 67 percent from 38
    percent in that period, the city’s dropout rate
    declined every year Mr. Duncan was at the helm,
    and students in Chicago's public schools
    increased their scores on the ACT during Mr.
    Duncan's tenure at a rate that is double the
    rate of improvements across the state, the
    president-elect said.

    Mr. Duncan will be part of a system “where we
    hold our schools, teachers, and government
    accountable for results,” Mr. Obama said.

    Hope for a Conciliatory Approach

    Admirers of the data-driven approach in Chicago
    include the current education secretary,
    Margaret Spellings. She backed such strategies
    at all levels of education, including calling
    for nationwide standards to judge the
    performance of colleges.

    “Arne has advanced policies to hold schools
    accountable for providing all our nation’s
    students—regardless of race, income level, or
    background—with a high-quality education,” Ms.
    Spellings said in a written statement. “His
    credibility and expertise will be invaluable as
    we continue working to equip students with the
    knowledge and skills they need to succeed and
    to make higher education affordable and
    accessible to all.”

    Anne D. Neal, who promoted Ms. Spellings’s push
    for standards-based assessments of colleges as
    a member of the National Advisory Committee on
    Institutional Quality and Integrity, the
    federal advisory body that reviews the
    performance of accrediting agencies, also
    endorsed the nomination.

    “He’s shown a willingness to innovate and to
    try new things such as pay for performance for
    teachers and administrators,” said Ms. Neal,
    president of the American Council of Trustees
    and Alumni.

    Mr. Duncan is a “safe” choice for Mr. Obama in
    that he is neither a defender of the
    educational establishment nor “a radical,” said
    Charles Miller, chairman of the Commission on
    the Future of Higher Education, which Ms.
    Spellings formed as a way of prodding colleges
    to prove the value they provide to students.

    Mr. Duncan’s Harvard background, however,
    “gives me pause,” Mr. Miller said, “mostly
    because people with personal experience at the
    elite universities seldom come to Washington
    with an understanding of the plight of the rest
    of higher education. They almost always are
    defenders of the system as it is and not very
    well versed in the shortcomings and dangers.”

    College leaders said the support of Ms.
    Spellings doesn’t necessarily mean Mr. Duncan
    will try to pick up where she left off in her
    largely unsuccessful bid to establish a method
    of comparing student performance across higher
    education.

    “You can be data-driven without necessarily
    thinking you have to do standardized tests,”
    Mr. Kirwan said.

    Even if Mr. Duncan is inclined to seek a system
    that would allow college performance to be
    compared nationally, he will most likely take
    seriously the concerns of opponents to the
    approach if his record in Chicago is any guide,
    Mr. Petrilli said. Some of the other school
    leaders who had been reported to be under
    consideration for the nomination as education
    secretary have confronted their teachers'
    unions directly, but Mr. Duncan has emphasized
    the need for finding common ground, Mr.
    Petrilli said.

    “Arne Duncan is like his new boss, in that they
    both look to bring people together rather than
    to create division and to point out
    differences,” Mr. Petrilli said. ”He’s not
    going to go out of his way to antagonize the
    higher-education community. I think he’ll work
    very hard listening to their concerns, and
    where he might disagree with them, I suspect
    he’ll do so in a way that will be quite
    conciliatory.”

    Student-loan company officials hold out similar
    hopes as they face a year in which Congress and
    the Obama administration might seek to overhaul
    lenders' role in the system of federally
    subsidized loans.

    Brett E. Lief, president of the National
    Council of Higher Education Loan Programs,
    which represents companies involved in student
    lending, said Mr. Duncan "seems precise."

    "He seems to evaluate every policy on a data
    basis,” Mr. Lief said.

    Mr. Obama advocated eliminating the bank-based
    system for distributing student-loan money
    during his campaign. Under Mr. Duncan, the
    Education Department may “be inclined to listen
    to a reasoned approach,” Mr. Lief said.

    That's “all that’s necessary,” he said. “A fair
    chance.”

    — Paul Basken
    Chronicle of Higher Education
    2008-12-16


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.