Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Federal Court Defendants Joel Klein & Ray Kelly: Our Education Mayor remains silent about police abuses of students in public schools

    Hentoff, who for decades has
    chronicled school abuses, says that not until
    the Bloomberg/Klein regime has he seen such
    flagrant dereliction of accountability at the
    very top of the school system for frequent
    abuse of students by police agents.


    By Nat Hentoff

    While Joel Klein was among those being
    seriously considered by Barack Obama for
    Secretary of Education—Chicago Superintendent
    Arne Duncan won out—a civil rights complaint,
    demanding a jury trial, was filed in U.S.
    District Court here. The defendants include
    Chancellor Klein, Police Commissioner Kelly,
    the City of New York, and School Safety Agent
    Daniel O'Connell. The plaintiff is Carlos Cruz,
    father of Stephen Cruz, an 11th-grade student
    at Robert F. Kennedy Community High School in
    Flushing, Queens.

    Klein is a defendant in the lawsuit, which was
    filed by attorney Jeffrey Rothman, because he
    "is and was at all times, the Commissioner of
    Education . . . and is responsible, in whole or
    in part, for the creation . . . and enforcement
    of the policies and practices . . . herein. He
    is sued individually and in his official
    capacity."

    I have reported often here on the documented
    abuses of students, and even some teachers, by
    the School Safety Agents deployed in this
    city's schools under Kelly, Klein, and Michael
    Bloomberg (the latter two praised around the
    country as champions of "school reform"). Since
    the 1950s, I've written in columns and books on
    our schools—and their chancellors from the
    worst to the best. But not until the
    Bloomberg/Klein regime have I seen such
    flagrant dereliction of accountability at the
    very top of the school system for frequent
    abuse of students by police agents. This
    Stephen Cruz case will be followed in next
    week's column by the even more outrageous
    treatment of 16-year-old Rohan Morgan at
    Hillcrest High School in Queens.

    Teaching fear of the police is part of the
    curriculum in the school system—of which
    Bloomberg is so proud that he is striving (with
    the help of the City Council) to control the
    schools permanently.

    On September 19, 2008, Stephen Cruz entered one
    of the stalls in the second-floor bathroom of
    his school and, as he leaned over to unbuckle
    his pants, School Safety Agent Daniel O'Connell
    —known as "Robocop" by the students—smashed
    open the door without any warning, let alone
    justification, cutting Stephen's head below the
    hairline. Bleeding, dizzy, the lump on his head
    swelling, Cruz showed his blood to the
    attacker, who said, "That's life. It will stop
    bleeding"—and left to do his safety rounds. A
    fellow student in the bathroom helped Cruz to
    the principal's office to get medical help.
    Cruz's parents were called to the school and
    told by the principal that since "Robocop" was
    an employee of the NYPD, he had no power to
    discipline the SWAT man.

    But why had O'Connell knocked down the door?
    Stephen's father kept trying to find out, but
    was told that the Safety Agent didn't even have
    to submit a report to school officials. His
    immediate boss was School Safety Agent
    Supervisor Anthony Pelosi at the 107th
    Precinct. The impotent principal did schedule a
    meeting at the precinct to discuss the
    violence, but Pelosi abruptly canceled it—with,
    of course, no explanation.

    Rothman said (as reported by the New York Civil
    Liberties Union, which has been trying to teach
    Klein and Bloomberg the Bill of Rights for
    years, concerning these cases): "It is
    appalling that the system is so broken that the
    only way for a parent to stand up for his son—
    and to prevent the same things from happening
    to other children—is to file a lawsuit and an
    Internal Affairs complaint." He added: "We
    shouldn't need attorneys to hold this man
    accountable for his shocking misconduct."

    But not only Robocop should be held
    accountable. (Place your bets on whether he'll
    even be chided in an NYPD Internal Affairs
    "investigation.") Where was the chancellor of
    this city's public school students? Where was
    the Education Mayor? Not shocked—and not heard
    from.

    If there are civics classes in our schools,
    then teachers—despite any fear of retaliation
    from the chancellor—should be reading to
    students from Rothman's suit during the
    testing-for-tests time of the No Child Left
    Behind Act: "School Safety Agent Daniel
    O'Connell, acting under color of law and
    without lawful justification, intentionally,
    maliciously, and with a deliberate indifference
    to—or a reckless disregard for the natural and
    probable consequences—caused injury and damage
    in violation of the plaintiff's constitutional
    rights . . ."

    As for the creepy cover-up, the lawsuit
    continues: "By their conduct and actions in
    covering up the conduct and actions of the
    School Safety Agent," the other culpable
    defendants include "Raymond Kelly and Joel
    Klein," who also scorned the constitutional
    rights of Stephen Cruz. This lawsuit—and others
    are coming—also focuses on the failure "to
    properly train, screen, supervise, or
    discipline" O'Connell and others in that chain
    of command. Most clearly accountable for that
    failure is, of course, Police Commissioner
    Kelly. Aside from what your flack may conjure
    up, what say you directly, Commissioner?

    Even more ultimately responsible for not
    bringing accountability and badly needed
    discipline to all of the potential defendants
    in this and other such lawsuits is the New York
    City Council leadership.

    As I've detailed in previous columns, the
    Student Safety Act, which has long been before
    the council, would finally compel transparency
    and accountability for these and other police
    practices in the schools. Only 28 of the 51
    council members support the Act, but there has
    yet to be even a hearing. Council member
    Melissa Mark-Viverito, a co-sponsor of the
    Student Safety Act, emphasizes: "What happened
    to Stephen is a disturbing reminder of the deep
    flaws in our Student Safety model. Ensuring
    students' safety is not a controversial matter.
    We all want safe schools, and this bill helps
    us meet that goal."

    Of all big school systems in the country, only
    in New York does student safety also have to be
    protected from agents of the police. Why is
    there no hearing on the bill by the City
    Council? In the past, I've blamed Speaker
    Christine Quinn, but I now know that blocking
    this peril to the safety of students,
    especially in mainly black and Hispanic
    schools, is Queens Councilman Peter Vallone
    Jr., chairman of the Public Safety Committee, a
    majority of whose members support the Student
    Safety Act. Mr. Vallone has yet to respond to
    my calls to him and to his aides.

    An assistant has told investigative reporter
    Vladic Ravich of the Queens Chronicle that
    there aren't enough funds for the Civilian
    Complaint Review Board to handle the additional
    casework of parent complaints about the
    Robocops among the Safety Agents. To hell with
    these parents and their children?! Vallone has
    two daughters in the public schools. I guess
    they're safe, too.

    School Safety Agent O'Connell is now patrolling
    a middle school nearby.

    — Nat Hentoff
    Village Voice
    2008-12-31


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.