Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    A Kindle in Every Backpack: A proposal for eTextbooks in American Schools

    Ohanian Comment: Another hair-brained idea from the Democratic Leadership Council. Now they call themselves the New Democratic Leadership Council.

    As though up-to-date teaching materials is the education crisis today.

    How would YOU like to be in charge in keeping track of those Kindles? And collecting for the ones that are lost or damaged?

    I'd like to see most elementary school textbooks dumped in a landfill, but that doesn't mean every kid needs a Kindle. It's scary to think that a fellow spouting such nonsense has been or is now close to the ear if the President.


    By Thomas Z. Freedman

    Introduction
    Amid the important and often heated debate over education reforms such as merit-based teacher
    pay and charter schools, the nation is missing an obvious opportunity to use new technology
    to improve dramatically the education our children receive. The new thinking should start with the
    heavy, often outdated textbooks students carry in their backpacks and read at school or home. We
    shouldn’t wait a decade or two to begin to achieve what is inevitable--an education system where
    each American schoolchild has an eTextbook, like Amazon’s Kindle, loaded with the most up-to-date
    and interactive teaching materials and texts available. The “Kindle in every backpack” concept isn’t
    just an educational gimmick—it could improve education quality and save money.

    This policy paper suggests we consider an innovative plan to spread eTextbooks around the
    country, rapidly scaling up employment of the technology so that we can learn, adapt, and perfect its
    use quickly. It describes the case for an eTextbook system in three parts. In Part One, it discusses the
    multiple reasons why eTextbooks are a much better approach for our nation’s students. The reasons
    they are superior include the ability to update eBooks relatively cheaply and easily, environmental and
    health benefits (such as reducing loads on young backs and shoulders), and the enormous opportunity
    to make texts more exciting and interactive—like the other tools children use today and that
    compete for their attention. In Part Two, this paper discusses the economics of this approach. Cost
    estimates in the education world are notoriously sketchy and often self-serving, but it seems clear that
    over time an investment in these tools would produce big savings. Finally, in Part Three, this paper
    outlines how we could implement such a plan, and why there could be broad-based support for it.

    As with any innovation, there are missteps to avoid in this process and there is much to learn,
    especially from professional educators. This proposal is just a concept, an idea to be refined and improved
    with more dialogue and input. It suggests, however, the time is now for an urgent conversation
    on bringing this new technology to the support of our schools and students so American education
    can once again lead the world.

    A Better Tool for Learning
    The most important benefit of eTextbooks is their ability to improve educational attainment. For
    less money than is spent on conventional textbooks, eTextbooks, over time, could deliver a regularly
    updated, interactive, and 21st-century education to our children. There are multiple reasons the technology
    offers an improved educational experience.

    First, eTextbooks can be updated instantly and universally, with little lead time. In contrast, traditional
    textbooks are slow to change. Once a new textbook has been written, the actual books must
    be purchased on a district-by-district basis and are sometimes only available when they are most
    profitable to publish.

    Our world is too fast-paced for the current process. America’s 21st-century students need
    educational materials that will help them meet the need for speed that the Internet age demands, as
    opposed to a print textbook system that is, in the words of a high school teacher recently quoted on
    the Colbert Report, “ancient history.”2 An eTextbook can be updated across the country as soon as
    the new text is written. And students don’t always have to wait for a new edition—textbook authors
    and publishers can update specific parts of texts without having to undertake a whole new print run.
    Instead, those select portions of eTextbooks can be automatically updated when necessary.

    Second, eTextbooks provide the kind of flexibility we know is critical to educational success.
    When we were children, the curricula came down from on high, with little flexibility to adjust to the
    needs of a particular school or classroom. This model doesn’t work well for everyone. We should
    provide teachers with more power and flexibility so they can design and modify curricula to improve
    outcomes, testing what works empirically.

    A digital textbook system allows districts, schools, and individual teachers to pick and choose
    the best materials for their students. Every literature class could read a different classic without having
    to worry about ordering too many or too few books.

    Third, eTextbooks are powerful because they help integrate classroom learning. Textbooks
    shouldn’t compete with the teacher—they should empower them. With an eTextbook, teachers can
    insert discussion questions, quizzes, and other materials that help integrate classroom materials and
    lessons into a more coherent educational plan. By allowing teachers some input, eTextbooks extend
    the reach of the classroom and ensure that instruction continues even when a child is studying at
    home. And these devices also make it easier for teachers to borrow the best material from other educators
    and provide it to their own students.

    Finally, eTextbooks can deliver a critical resource to struggling schools. It's a sad reality that economically
    deprived schools and districts generally lag in educational success. Some school districts
    simply don’t have the materials to provide their students with first-rate opportunities. This isn't just
    a problem of equity, it's a problem of adequacy. We're only going to be the best educated country in
    the world when we provide an adequate education to every child, and that means a plan that puts
    eTextbooks in everyone's hands. If there is no coherent plan to share this new technology, wealthier
    school districts will, once again, reap most of the immediate benefits

    An eTextbook system can improve the quality of education in struggling districts without costing
    more money. While we need a more comprehensive solution to improve America's worst-off schools,
    eTextbooks are a direct way to improve the quality of instruction by giving children texts that are more
    accessible and up-to-date.

    It's worth noting another potential benefit of replacing traditional paper textbooks with an eTextbook
    device: easing the burden on the backs of our children—literally. Although most research has
    been confined to college students, studies suggest that heavy backpacks laden with textbooks can
    cause back pain and other health problems. Boston University researchers found back pain or discomfort
    afflicts an overwhelming 85 percent of college students using backpacks.3 And according to
    a 2007 survey administered by the National College Health Assessment, students at Minnesota State
    reported back pain as the most widespread health problem.4

    There are 56 million K-12 school children,5 and the environmental benefits of ending the era of
    giant paper textbooks and reducing the burden on students’ backs makes a technological fix all the
    more overdue.

    Traditional textbooks are learning tools whose time is passing; they are ready for replacement.
    We have a 21st-century technology that can help our children learn and drive a key industry, and it
    should be driving our innovation in school.

    A Good Deal for Students, Educators, and
    Taxpayers

    Textbooks are too expensive. Current estimates show we spend $109 dollars per student for
    traditional textbooks6 and a total of over $6 billion dollars annually on textbooks across the education
    system.7 By 2016, the total spent on textbooks is expected to rise to almost $6.5 billion dollars annually8
    and to an accumulated total of $56 billion dollars.9

    For the money we're spending, we should expect a top-notch product. Instead, we send students
    off to school with woefully out-of-date materials. In New York State, for example, the average
    cost of a school library book is about $21 for an elementary school book and about $23 for a secondary
    school book, and the average publicatio

    Amazon's Kindle, and other eBook devices, demonstrate the potential of new technology to
    help readers carry easy-to-read mini-libraries with them everywhere. And the costs per book have
    dropped. A bestseller on Kindle costs the reader only $10.11 Right now, the average eTextbook price
    is $50,12 but the forecast is for that to drop about $10 dollars a year to a level price of $20 from 2012
    onward.13

    While the upfront hardware cost of providing a Kindle-like device to every child would necessitate
    a high front-end investment, costs for eTextbooks themselves would quickly produce a savings compared
    with print textbooks. While the total cost per student for paper textbooks is expected to rise,
    from $109 now to $115 in 2016,14 the per-student cost of eTextbook materials would be about $200
    initially15 and then could dive to about $80 by 2012.16

    Costs could decrease even faster as more companies promote Kindle-like products in the market.
    This process is already underway—competitive devices are currently being released with price
    tags $110 less than the Kindle.17

    Over time, this could provide enormous savings. Over the first four or so years of an eTextbook
    system, we would spend about $9 billion more—in total—than the traditional textbook scheme. Yet
    by the last year of that initial period, we could have already supplied Kindles, or the digital equivalent,
    to 100 percent of our students. At that point, the savings would kick in, beginning at over $700 million
    in the fifth year before holding steady at around $500 million annually in the years immediately
    following.18

    The savings only increase as more students switch to an eTextbook system. From the fourth
    year on, every student could have a Kindle in his or her backpack and the program would become
    increasingly more efficient than print textbooks.

    Reining in school costs is an important concern in our quest to improve education in this country.
    According to the Department of Education, our school districts spent $476.8 billion in 200719—more
    than half of the recent economic recovery package for the entire nation. If we can create savings in
    one category, the funds can be reassigned to others, like improving teacher pay.

    It is common knowledge that spending per student has skyrocketed each decade. Average
    spending per K-12 student in 2007 was $9,683. After inflation, that’s 29 percent higher than 1995
    and an eye-opening 55.7 percent higher than 1985.20

    Unfortunately, per-pupil costs have been rising during a time when states have fewer resources
    for education. Before school stabilization funding was included in the recent stimulus bill, state education

    funds were predicted to drop by 18.5 percent by Fiscal Year 2011, or $54 billion less than
    originally budgeted for the next two years.21

    The stimulus bill passed in February will hedge against this sharp decline in the immediate future,
    but that’s not a long-term solution to school spending woes. Kindle-like devices alone can’t solve the
    problem, but they can be an integral part of the overall solution. If our schools are going to be better,
    then we need to provide cost-effective instructional materials that reduce pressure on budgets and
    improve the tools our children use to learn.

    How We Can Put a Kindle in Every Backpack

    A smart plan to implement an eTextbook strategy would phase in the new technology to ensure
    it's adapted and developed to be of maximum use to students, and to build real public and political
    support. In addition, we must promote competition in the development of the technology and provide
    ample time for educational professionals to learn about, and effectively integrate, this tool into their
    classrooms. Once the decision to move forward is made, we could potentially complete this transition
    in less than a decade.

    As we scale up and develop the technology, we should pay close attention to what students say
    they want in the new eTextbooks. A study of student preferences found that 29 percent of students in
    middle and high schools already use an online textbook or curriculum and they have some clear ideas
    of what a useful eTextbook system would look like.22

    Students also have some good ideas for features of an eTextbook. In a sampling of 6th through
    12th graders, almost two-thirds of students want to be able to add highlights and notes to their books
    as they study. Almost two-thirds also want to be able to take tests on their own to see how they're
    doing in class, while almost half want access to tutorials where they control the lesson’s pace and
    progress. About half of students want access to real-time data like Google Earth. Finally, about one third
    want access to academic content outside school materials, including links to videoconferences
    and podcasts from subject experts.23 Many of these features could potentially be accommodated in
    an eTextbook, or coordinated with evolving eTextbook curricula.

    It should be possible to build political support for this innovative effort. According to a nationwide
    survey, only 5 percent of parents dislike the concept of online textbooks.24 Students are already using
    this new technology in their daily lives. Parents understand that print textbooks tend to be expensive,
    quickly fall out of date in key areas like history and government, and, because they are heavy and
    bulky, can be tough for kids to transport to school and carry around from class to class. eTextbooks
    can be cheaper, offer more timely and wide-ranging material, and be more convenient for kids. Teachers
    too will be able to use more up-to-date material, with more applications and tools available to
    them. Overall, the innovation has potential to unite sometimes warring constituencies—teachers,
    parents, and the business community—as well.

    A logical phase-in would scale up a "Kindle in a backpack" plan, testing first to see how it performed
    in a large group of diverse student communities, but with a clear plan for expansion that could
    bring the effort to a scale that could quickly be cost effective. One approach would begin with a set of
    pilot programs in the first year with under 400,000 students—about half a percent of all K-12 students
    nationwide—and two times that number in the second year, providing a substantial base of early data,
    and the ability for leaders to learn as well as develop and improve a new eTextbooks program as it
    goes truly national.

    By generating a massive increase in demand through the scale up, the initiative would also
    generate increased competition from eTextbook developers and eventually better products and lower
    prices. If the effort followed this approach, one could see an increase in the number of students using
    eTextbooks from half a percent to half of all students after just three years, during which time the per
    student cost of eTextbooks would become less than that of regular textbooks.
    A rapid scale up plan--with a very aggressive pursuit of the "Kindle in every backpack" concept--
    could reach 100 percent of students within four years, and within five years eTextbooks would
    cost a fraction per student as much as print textbooks. By then, the program would have put over 56
    million eTextbooks in our schools and saved hundreds of millions annually.

    Such an effort would be ambitious (alternative approaches could be slower, or faster, and pilot efforts
    may suggest how aggressively we should develop this plan). But we should aim to be ambitious
    in this effort. We need to try big ideas in the education world. We need to put the best technology in
    our students’ hands, and changing the landscape of textbooks over the coming decades is a mission
    worthy of our country and our nation’s goals for the future.

    Conclusion

    Our educational system is at a crossroads. Educating our children has become increasingly expensive
    while the performance of our K-12 students lags behind other industrialized nations. So far,
    the debate has centered on teaching quality and subject matter. Putting great teachers in classrooms
    is essential, as is focusing on the science and mathematics skills that will make our students competitive
    in a technology-driven 21st century.

    We fail our students when we ask them to learn advanced skills with dated, inflexible textbooks.
    Instead of sending our children to school every day with the textbook equivalent of an abacus, we
    need to provide them with the up-to-date tools already available to American consumers.

    Putting a Kindle-like tool in every backpack will improve education while lowering its cost. This
    tool will ensure that our children receive the most up-to-date education, and enhance our efforts to
    improve instruction through interactivity and adaptability of curriculum.

    This initiative will also do more than just save on the cost of education materials. It will lessen the
    toll on our natural environment, help accelerate our nation’s technological development, and improve
    the health of our students.

    This is an idea that deserves serious discussion, further research, public commitment, and, ultimately,
    a smart, pragmatic plan for implementation.

    Thomas Z. Freedman, a senior fellow at the new Democratic Leadership Council, is also
    president of Freedman Consulting, LLC. He served in the Clinton Administration as Senior Advisor
    to the President, and prior to that as Special Assistant to the President for policy planning. He also
    served as a member of the 2008 presidential Obama-Biden Transition Project on the Technology,
    Innovation, and Government Reform Policy Working Group. He is also a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute.
    Here are clients of his firm:
    # The Alliance to End Hunger
    # American Express
    # Bread for the World
    # The Center for Law and Social Policy
    # The Center for State and Local Goverment Excellence
    # Cisco Systems
    # Congressman Anthony Weiner for New York Mayor '05
    # Clinton/Gore '96
    # The Democratic Leadership Council
    # The Ford Foundation
    # Living Cities
    # MeetUp Inc.
    # The National Security Project
    # Our Pledge
    # The ONE Campaign
    # The Partnership for Public Service
    # The Rockefeller Foundation
    # Share Our Strength
    # Women's Voices. Women Vote.



    — Thomas Z. Freedman
    The New Democratic Leadership Council
    2009-07-15
    http://www.dlc.org/documents/DLC_Freedman_Kindle_0709.pdf


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.