Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Please Hold for Mr. Duncan...

    Reader Comment:
    I come from a family of Windy City teachers and, as much as we support Obama, we were all pretty disappointed to hear that he'd selected Arne Duncan to be his top education guy. Both Duncan and his predecessor in Chicago, Paul Vallas, seemed to take very business-oriented approaches to schooling, consulting standardized test scores like market research. Our major concerns involved the charter school movement's dismantling of public schooling and teachers unions. Of course, there has been a lot of debate about this and a recent Newsweek cover story lauding the firing of every teacher in a struggling Rhode Island high school. In response, Bill Maher said on his show that it's the parents, not the teachers, of failing students who should be fired. But I think it's high time that parents and teachers join forces and take education out of the hands of businessmen and politicians. Simply put, parents and teachers think of kids, while businessmen and politicians, by and large, think of money and power. Thanks for being one of those "helicopter" parents who fight for what's best for the kids!


    by Matt Farmer

    If I knew back in January 2008 what I know now, I never would have picked up the phone to call Arne Duncan.

    I probably would have dialed his wife or his mother instead.

    The recent Chicago Tribune story about Duncan and his "clout list" suggests that I may have been better served by placing calls to Duncan's distaff side -- provided, of course, I dropped the right names during those discussions.

    You see, back in January 2008, I heard a rumor that the former CPS CEO had decided to move my youngest daughter's grade school across town. Duncan's plan, according to the rumor mill, was to relocate our K-8 school into an under-utilized building that was already serving as home to 300 junior-high students.

    That didn't strike me as a particularly good idea. My daughter was in kindergarten at the time, and despite my best efforts, I couldn't identify another CPS facility that sported a 10:1 ratio of teenagers to kindergarteners. (A CPS official eventually confirmed that there was no such beast.) But as I said, Duncan's planned move was still just a rumor at that point.

    So rather than traffic in rumor, I called Duncan's office to find out what he had in store for my daughter and her classmates. To cover my bases, I also called the office of then-Board of Education president Rufus Williams to ask the same basic questions. Neither gentleman took my call, so I left polite, detailed messages for each man - all for naught, of course. No one from either office ever responded to my inquiries. (Duncan's gang, as we learned last week, was likely too busy placing calls to principals on behalf of well-connected patricians and politicians.)

    Don't get me wrong. I didn't actually expect Duncan or Williams to contact me, but I did hold out hope that I might hear back from a secretary, a staffer, or maybe even a robo-caller. No such luck.

    But I am persistent, so I eventually sent a short (and entirely pleasant) e-mail message to Duncan's office asking the same basic questions about a possible move. I ended my brief e-mail message with the following statement:

    I'm confident you'd ask the same questions and have the same concerns if you were in my shoes. I look forward to your response.

    Thanks,
    Matt Farmer

    Again, radio silence from Duncan's office. As I later learned, several of my fellow parents were running into the same dead-end.

    We parents quickly concluded that CPS's institutional silence was not a good sign, so we organized and began pitching the story to members of the local media. We hoped that might get the attention of the folks at CPS headquarters. As it turned out, a number of reporters were interested in what we had to say. In fact, on the morning of the board's January 2008 meeting, we awoke to hear a thoughtful piece about our school on public radio, and we also got some good ink in the Chicago Tribune.

    A few hours later, reporters from five TV stations, two radio stations, and at least three newspapers showed up at CPS headquarters to cover the day's events. Duncan stuck to the script, telling almost 150 of our parents that no decisions had been made concerning the fate of our school.

    Twenty-four hours later, however, it was a different story. Duncan proved the rumor mill correct by announcing his plan to move our kids. One month later, the board unanimously voted us out.

    On the day of that vote, Duncan explained to the media that the move would enable CPS to expand our school's highly-regarded program. For those scoring at home, the promised expansion didn't happen, and Duncan has since moved on to greener pastures.

    Are he and his family members still making calls on behalf of the children of Chicago's "A-list" parents? I doubt it. Duncan is likely too busy with his latest effort, traveling from state to state with bags of cash hosting "Who Wants to Be a 'Race to the Top' Millionaire?"

    It's anyone's guess whether our school would have been saved from relocation had our parents sported stronger Rolodexes. But the recent Tribune series leaves no doubt that it would have at least given us a fighting chance -- something we never had back in January 2008.

    — Matt Farmer
    Huffington Post
    2010-03-30
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-farmer/please-hold-for-mr-duncan_b_517789.html


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.