Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


The Eggplant

 

in the collection  

Staking OUt the Successful Student


Abstract

With the performance of students, teachers, and schools defining success under current standards-based accountability policies (e.g. Chicago Public Schools (Note 1); No Child Left Behind Act, (United States Department of Education, 2002)), school districts are implementing various forms of intervention programs as a means to improve student performance. By examining a pilot summer school program that is transitioning from a ‘low-stakes’ to a ‘high-stakes’ intervention program, this article examines the possibilities that exist for students to author themselves as learners, and it questions whether opportunities for students to identify themselves as successful learners are lost when an intervention program, such as summer school, becomes mandatory. The implications of this analysis highlight questions and concerns that policymakers and school personnel need to address when formulating high-stakes standards-based accountability policies and intervention programs.

The Contest
This study took place in a mid-size city in the Midwestern United States in the summer of
2002. The District developed this summer intervention program in response to a state-based statute titled No Social Promotion for grades 4 and 8 (Note 6). This statute called for local school districts to develop a set of promotional criteria based on student performance on the state’s standardized tests
at grades 4 and 8, a student’s report card, and teacher recommendations. The District developed a policy that determines the promotion of a student to the fifth or ninth grade to be based on a set of District-developed hierarchical criteria (Note 7). The District’s first criterion is for the student to attain a minimum grade in language arts, math, science, and social studies. Failure to do so requires
the student to attain a proficiency score of basic in that subject area on a state-based standardized test (Note 8). Failure to achieve that score(s) provides the student with the option to be retained or to attend a summer program. Thus, the student must pass the summer program in order to be promoted.

Read the rest at the pdf url below.

— Christopher Brown, University of Texas–Austin
Education Policy Analysis Archives
http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n14/v13n14.pdf


INDEX OF THE EGGPLANT


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.