Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

The Eggplant


in the collection  

NCLB's Extra Credit Won't Tell You About Mutiny

Every day Geoffrey Goodman at the U. S. Department of Education sends out a good news message called NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND EXTRA CREDIT. The message is an excerpt of a news article saying something positive about NCLB. Excerpt is the operative phrase here.

Here is the mailing from February 18, 2005.

Flexibility within NCLB

The following are excerpts from a recent editorial in The Baltimore Sun about Secretary Spellings and her flexibility approach to No Child Left Behind. The editorial gives examples of how some states are benefiting from No Child Left Behind in ways that are feasible for them.

“The new secretary of education, Margaret Spellings, is sending some welcome signals that her department may take a more pragmatic approach than that of her predecessor in implementing the No Child Left Behind law. In some recent appearances and interviews, Ms. Spellings has let it be known that states seeking at least some flexibility in the onerous law may find more sympathy at the department, instead of having to complain to Congress. She's not flinching on NCLB's core strategy of annual assessments, but Ms. Spellings is right to try to work with states to iron out differences.

“Her department has already cleared up a misunderstanding with North Dakota about whether some 4,000 veteran teachers there were ‘highly qualified,’ as the law requires. In a significant policy shift, she has acknowledged that some states, such as New York, suffer from overcrowding in high-performing schools, and therefore may not be able to offer transfers to students in low-performing schools as required under NCLB's regulations. The fact that more students in low-performing schools are opting to be tutored at federal expense rather than insisting on being transferred helps explain her more lenient attitude.

“But Ms. Spellings is standing pat on NCLB's basic requirements to test students in grades three to eight annually, to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups of students and to hold states accountable for the results. Several states are still chafing under the law's core mandates. . . .”

“Ms. Spellings has her work cut out for her. She would do well to remember that to achieve meaningful results across 50 states, flexibility may be her most valuable tool.”

Note the elipses? Here is what was left out from the Baltimore Sun editorial:

"This week the Utah House of Representatives unanimously passed a bill that requires state officials to pay more attention to local, rather than federal, education goals and to spend only a minimal amount of state money to implement federal programs. In the face of such threatened mutiny. . . .

Let the reader of government communiques beware. Let us all rise up in mutiny.

— Geoffrey Goodman
U. S. Department of Education


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.