Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    In Colorado, What Part of NO Don't Voucher Proponents Get?

    "I see no way to interpret the voucher program statute in a way that does not run afoul of the principle of local control," Meyer wrote. "The goals of the voucher program are laudable. However, even great ideas must be implemented
    within the framework of the Colorado Constitution."
    --Denver District Judge Joseph Meyer

    VOUCHERS RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL

    "No" is a powerful word in the courts this week. On Monday, the Supreme Court of Colorado told the legislature that the redistricting bill they passed last session was unconstitutional. This morning at 10:00 AM, a Denver District Court told the legislature that the voucher bill they passed last session was
    unconstitutional as well. Both decisions are expected to be appealed.

    Colorado PTA is the lead plaintiff in the voucher lawsuit. President Mark Townsend had this to say about today's decision, "I applaud the court's decision to uphold the Constitution of the State of Colorado. One of our positions
    all along has been that the voucher program was unconstitutional. While I respectfully disagree with the judge that vouchers are a good idea, I wholeheartedly agree with Judge Meyer's statement that any program needs to fit within the framework of the Colorado Constitution."

    "My excitement over the court's decision, however, is tempered by the sober
    realization that many of the legal issues raised in the lawsuit were never resolved. So, by no means, is the voucher issue dead. And, of course, the governor has already indicated that the state will appeal the decision. Several legislators had already indicated that there will be multiple voucher bills proposed in the coming session. So, no, the voucher issue is not dead. And there are still many legal arguments, including the constitutional provision prohibiting appropriation of state funds to private or religious schools, that have yet to be resolved. Only two of the eight legal arguments brought up in our lawsuit were argued-one was rejected and one was ruled sufficient to overturn the entire voucher bill as unconstitutional."

    "After all, the Constitution of the State of Colorado is the law of the land.I'm thankful that Judge Meyer has reminded the legislative and the executive branches of that fact." Colorado PTA is an organization with 34,000 members and a long history of opposing vouchers.

    Governor Bill Owens made this statement to 9 News today, "Securing school choice for the children of Colorado was a long legislative struggle and there was always the likelihood the struggle would extend to the courts as well. Children from low-income families should not be facing a dead end if they are in a
    school that is below par. They deserve a choice and that is why we will appeal the court's decision." In another interview about the newly released CSAP results today, Owens said, "We've seen tremendous progress in our schools across the state." The number of kids attending unsatisfactory schools has been cut
    by 80 percent in the last three years and a voucher bill would drain $90 million per year from districts with unsatisfactory schools, according to state budget officials. How is it that these schools are a "dead end" and making
    "tremendous progress" all in the same day? Do we develop the "cut and run" mentality of vouchers or the "fix and make better" attitude of CSAP?

    Vouchers are another predominately partisan issue at the legislature with
    Republicans in favor of them and Democrats opposed. Representation of, by, and
    for the people rules here, yet the people of Colorado have voted vouchers down time and again. In 1992 they were called "Vouchers," in 1998 they were called "Tuition Tax Credits." Both initiatives failed and numerous legislative bills for vouchers have failed consistently every year in the legislature except for last session. Now a court has ruled that that voucher bill entitled "Colorado Opportunity Contract Pilot Program" is unconstitutional, but it will be appealed.One wonders what part of the word "No" is not understood.

    — Vicki Newell
    A Parent's Perspective on What's Happening in Colorado
    Capitol QIPS (Quality Improvement Process Strategy)
    2003-12-03


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.