Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Tests Make Mark in Kids' Psyches

    In the high-stakes heist at the heart of The Perfect Score, due in theaters Jan. 30, six young thieves conspire to steal the biggest prize of all: the answers to the SAT.

    What, you were expecting a stash of cash in Vegas? Diamonds in Istanbul?

    It may just be sheets of multiple-choice questions at SAT headquarters in Princeton, N.J., but the stakes couldn't be higher.

    Popular culture is beginning to tap into a rich vein of fear among school kids as young as 9 years old: performing poorly on standardized tests. Increasingly, the lives of millions of children revolve around these tests, which can define who they are and what they learn. A single test can now decide whether they graduate from high school, advance to the next grade or attend a school judged "in need of improvement."

    Forget killer sharks, evil emperors and chain-saw-wielding wackos. If you really want to scare the wits out of kids these days, make the bad guy a freshly sharpened No. 2 pencil.

    "Tests loom large in children's lives, because they loom large in educators' lives," says Anne Young, principal of Clark Elementary School in Franklin, Ind.

    Kids have always suffered through tests. A famous bumper sticker jokes, "As long as there are tests, there will be prayer in school."

    But in recent years, tests have multiplied as school districts try to make schools and students more accountable. When they make it to high school, this generation of students faces graduation exams their parents never imagined. More students are applying to college, making college slots more competitive. As admissions officers sort out the academic high achievers from the rest, they rely more than ever on one test: the SAT.

    Testing has simply become part of kid culture, says Gary Phillips, former deputy commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics. "They talk a lot about tests, think a lot about tests."

    On television, Fox's Boston Public frequently dwells on Massachusetts' tough high school exit exam; another Fox TV hit, That '70s Show, stars a character who did poorly on his college entrance exams.

    In a recent episode of WB's sitcom Like Family, one character wants to blow off his PSATs. On WB's hit drama Everwood recently, college recruiters told students that every test affects their futures. And Gilmore Girls' Rory has worried about the SATs as well.

    Even British wizards-in-training aren't immune. In last summer's Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Harry, now in his fifth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, sweats over his Ordinary Wizarding Level, or O.W.L. exams, his first standardized tests.

    As if getting into college weren't enough, in 2002, President Bush's No Child Left Behind education reform law increased testing exponentially for younger students, requiring public schools to give annual math and reading tests to students as early as third grade.

    "It's what they're coming to expect from school," says best-selling children's author Andrew Clements. His new book, The Report Card, which arrives in April, deals with the fallout from standardized testing in elementary school. Clements' hero, a fifth-grade genius named Nora, secretly studies at MIT and sees soccer games as physics problems. She intentionally earns D's on her report card to make a point about intelligence, grades and testing.

    In previous books, Clements has tackled teacher burnout, censorship and racism. A former teacher, Clements says he wrote The Report Card to discuss the issue, not to slam standardized tests.

    "I'm not suggesting that these things should go away," he says. "They just need to be put in proper perspective."

    But a few of his characters speak their minds. Nora complains that tests and grades change everything:

    "The smart kids feel smarter and better and get all stuck-up, and the regular kids feel stupid and like there's no way to ever catch up. And the people who are supposed to help kids, the parents and the teachers, they don't. They just keep making up more tests."

    A school librarian confesses being upset that she has to hand out grades in library skills; Nora's mother, who sells real estate, admits that poor test scores drive down home prices.

    "How can it not start to define school in your mind?" Clements says.

    Phillips likens testing to a thermometer: "It doesn't tell you everything about the student; it just gives you a check.

    "Testing is sort of here to stay. Most policymakers feel that without it, you're flying without radar."

    But the approach has created a backlash.

    "The test culture is pervasive in public schools," says Bob Schaeffer of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, or FairTest. Schaeffer says students take 36 to 60 standardized tests in their K-12 career.

    "It becomes the dominant factor in the public school experience."

    A few critics have even taken to calling these testing advocates "standardistas."

    Most states don't penalize younger children who do poorly on standardized tests, but when scores don't improve for virtually all students, No Child Left Behind requires that schools offer free tutoring or transfers.

    Tests always have carried high stakes for kids. But David Berliner, an education professor at Arizona State University, says: "What's heightened now is the repercussions for not doing well. That puts a layer of stress they haven't quite had before."

    In 19 states, students who don't pass a high school exit exam are denied a diploma.

    In 2000, an error by National Computer Systems (NCS) on Minnesota's exit exam resulted in nearly 8,000 high school students mistakenly failing the math portion. In November 2002, students settled a lawsuit against NCS, which agreed to pay up to $7 million to families. A few high school seniors received as much as $16,000 each after they sought counseling, were excluded from graduation ceremonies and athletics or were forced to get tutoring because of "failing" scores.

    For those who want to go to college, the SAT has become more important than ever, says Justin Kestler of Sparknotes.com, which publishes online study guides. "The SAT is like death and taxes for teenagers, this rite of passage and, in some ways, an impediment to adult life."

    Colleges now rely less on grade-point averages, seeing them as an unreliable measure, says Seppy Basili, a vice president at Kaplan, the test-prep company.

    Also, Basili says, by the time you're a high school junior or senior, the SAT is "your only lever" to improve your chances of getting into a good college.

    Students spend months and sometimes thousands of dollars studying and purchasing books and courses to improve their scores, spawning a multimillion-dollar test-prep industry. Kaplan recently became the most profitable division of its parent, The Washington Post Co.

    Krystyna Karmol, a senior at Cranford, N.J., High School, didn't fret about her SAT scores — until she visited colleges and learned that her scores were a bit low for the schools she wanted to attend.

    "That's really when the stress started building up," she says. "I took classes, I went online, I even got books."

    In The Perfect Score, which stars Erika Christensen and Scarlett Johansson, no matter how much the leads prepare, they can't seem to get the score they need.

    "Basically, the test is standing in the way of what they want to do and who they want to be," director Brian Robbins says. "Ultimately, who they really are has nothing to do with their score on the test, and who they might become has nothing to do with how they might score on the test.

    "But unfortunately, they have to get through that roadblock."

    — Greg Toppo
    Tests Make Mark in Kids' Psyches
    USA Today
    2004-01-13
    http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2004-01-13-sat-pop-culture_x.htm


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.