Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Outrages

 

9486 in the collection  

    Princeton Review Accused of Cheating and Plagiarism

    The firm hired to provide new math and reading tests to city public school kids has been accused of cheating and plagiarism, according to an explosive federal lawsuit obtained by The Post.

    Princeton Review - one of the nation's largest test-coaching companies - was just given a three-year, $8 million contract by Schools Chancellor Joel Klein in July to design and administer periodic quizzes for students in grades 3 through 8 to help identify their strengths and weaknesses.

    But here's a little secret.

    The group representing the nation's prestigious medical schools and teaching hospitals charged Princeton Review with copyright infringement, fraud and misappropriation of trade secrets for illegally "tapping" its biannual Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) - just months before the city contract was awarded.

    Aspiring doctors must take the MCAT to be considered for admission to medical school. The test is administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

    The suit alleges that "Princeton Review solicited, encouraged and paid its employees and/or agents to take MCAT exams, memorize the secure, copyrighted questions and answers on the exams, and then help create a detailed report reconstructing the content of the questions and answers."

    People paid to take tests and reconstruct their contents are called "tappers."

    In court papers, the medical group said it obtained a copy of an internal 30-page Princeton Review report that recreated 108 "memorized and reconstructed" questions from the April 2002 medical exam - nearly half of all the 221 questions.

    The group said many of the questions are repeated in subsequent exams.

    Asked about awarding a testing contract to a firm facing serious allegations of cheating, a spokesman for Klein said that Princeton Review's bid proposal "was judged based on the merits."

    Princeton Review Chairman John Katzman insisted the firm did not break the law.

    He said the pending case has nothing to do with the interim assessment program his firm is performing for the city school system.

    "They're saying we crossed the line. We're saying we didn't," he said.

    — Carl Campanile
    SUIT RIPS ED. TEST FIRM FOR 'COPYING'
    New York Post
    2003-09-15
    http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/5811.htm


    INDEX OF OUTRAGES

Pages: 380   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next >>    Last >>


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.